Follow Us:

Posts Tagged ‘RETROGRESSION’

Foreign Expats Heading Home in Dramatic Numbers

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

As reported in Workforce Magazine

The lack of opportunities in the U.S. plus burgeoning business opportunities on their home turf are causing foreign workers to return to their native lands. Experts warn that the shift will force domestic firms to compete with their one-time workforce as they open their own companies in their native countries.

A 2009 survey by financial firm HSBC revealed that 23 percent of expats in the United States and 44 percent in the United Kingdom were considering going home because of the global economy. Although they originate from several countries, these expats from the U.S. and U.K. cited limited career prospects as the top reason for returning home.

Back in the U.S., the story is particularly startling, with one expert contending that the tide of expats heading home has reached historic proportions.

“For the first time in American history, expats are leaving,” says Vivek Wadhwa, senior research associate with the Labor and Worklife Program at Harvard Law School. “For the last decade or so, there’s been a massive outflux of talent, particularly to India and China. These are typically skilled professionals in the prime of their careers.”

Wadhwa says between 50,000 and 75,000 Indian and Chinese professionals went back home in the last 20 years. Those numbers will soon more than double.

“There will be another 100,000 to India and 100,000 to China in the next five years,” he says. “These people are driving innovations in their home countries that will become competitors to America.”

A shortage of green cards is a major cause for Indians and Chinese, as well as Brazilians and Russians, to return home. “We have a 10-year backlog for green cards,” Wadhwa says. “There are more than one million skilled immigrants—about 35 percent Indian and 25 percent Chinese—who are waiting.

“When we start seeing the next Google coming out of India and China, and people realize these advances are coming from former expats, that’s when the alarm bells will go off,” Wadhwa says.

Many of these expats would like to stay, says Lynn Shotwell, executive director of the American Council on International Personnel, an organization advocating improved business immigration policies.

“The perception is that if we really wanted to change things, we would,” she says. “The question is, are we losing our edge? The ability to attract the best and brightest from around the world was always a big strength for the U.S. Now we’re pulling up the welcome mat.”

Thanks to the recession, companies are evaluating the costs of international assignments and the need to bring expatriates home. . “Before, companies felt they needed to send people [abroad] to open markets and transfer technology and culture,” says Scott Sullivan, executive vice president of Brookfield Global Relocation Services, an international, full-service relocation company. “Now there are lots of capable people in those countries who can perform those jobs. [Companies ask] if they really need to send people overseas or can we hire locally. This is a big dynamic in global business.”

Retrogression: DOS Report

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

The petitions of applicants who will be processed at an overseas US Consular post are forwarded by USCIS to the Department of State (DOS).  Applicants in categories subject to numerical limit are registered on the visa waiting list.  Each case is assigned a priority date based on the filing date of the initial petition.  There are about 3.5 million on this list.  This is positively disastrous when you consider that our current laws permit 376,000 people to immigrant to the USA each year under the family-based and employment-based systems, with the average wait being over 10 years long!

There are probably another 1 million in the USA waiting to adjust their status and these numbers aren’t even reflected in the DOS report.

About 95% of the people on the list are in the family-based categories and more than 1/2 of these are  in the brother-sister 4th preference category.  At the 65,000 number level for this category, this is a wait time that averages 10-26 years!

The total employment numbers waiting a priority date:  130,509 including 119,759 in the EB-3 category.  This is a 3-4 year wait, ignoring per country limits.  The countries with the largest backlogs are the Philippines (45,331 – mostly nurses and their families.  Yes, there’s something wrong with this picture!) and India (20,467 – mostly IT professionals and their families – something is wrong with this picture, too!).  Then we hear politicians and uninformed folks saying “get in line and wait your turn”  – like the line is actually moving!

It’s a sad state of affairs that points squarely at the fact that we must first focus on legal immigration reform – getting these wait times down to something reasonable.  Do we have any representatives courageous enough to vote for legal immigration reform so that we have a system that doesn’t punish people who play by the rules?

Nurses: H-1Bs and Healthcare Reform

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

3rd in a Series: Nurse Practitioners

While working on this series, USCIS notified that the H-1B cap was met on December 21, 2009 for fiscal year 2010.  USCIS will reject cap-subject petitions for new H-1B specialty occupation workers seeking an employment start date in FY 2010 that arrive after Dec. 21, 2009.

USCIS will apply a computer-generated random selection process to all petitions that are subject to the cap and were received on Dec. 21, 2009 and will use this process to select petitions needed to meet the cap.  USCIS will reject, and return the fee, for all cap-subject petitions not randomly selected.

Petitions filed on behalf of current H-1B workers who have been counted previously against the cap will not be counted towards the congressionally mandated FY 2010 H-1B cap. Therefore, USCIS will continue to process petitions filed for:

1)     Extensions of H-1B’s for the same employer

2)     Changes of employer from one H-1B employer to another

3)     Petitions amending a material change in employment (such as a change in jobsite location)

4)     H-1B employer petitions seeking concurrent H-1B employment; and

5)     Petitions filed by exempt employers. Exempt employers are non-profit organizations that are affiliated with institutions of higher education, nonprofit  research organizations or governmental research organizations.

 

::::::

What Nurse Positions Qualify and meet the Requisite Requirements for H-1Bs?

Category 1:  The first category of nurses who generally will be approved is the certified advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) category that includes:

·        Clinical nurse specialists (CNS’)
·        Certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNAs)
·        Certified nurse-midwives (CNMs)
·        Certified nurse practitioners (Nurse Practitioners fall within this   category

Category 2: The second category of nurses who may qualify for the H-1B are those in administrative positions requiring graduate degrees in fields such as nursing or health administration.

Category 3: A final, more subjective group that may receive H-1B approval includes those who have a nursing specialty such as critical care and peri-operative nurses, or who have passed examinations based on clinical experience in school health, occupational health, rehabilitation nursing, emergency room nursing, critical care, operating room, oncology, and pediatrics, ICU, dialysis and cardiology.

 

:::::

At an American Academy of Nursing news briefing earlier this year on nurse-managed care and health solutions for our ailing healthcare system, former Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala and others sent a coherent message:

Nurse practitioners (NPs) have developed an infrastructure of health centers and convenient care clinics (such as Minute Clinics) that can help our nation reform a health care delivery system that is currently unable to meet the primary health care needs of its people.  Shalala noted,“NPs are going to be key to health care reform and must be at the health care reform tables. Nurses are part of the solution.  It’s a solution in plain sight.”

Nurse Practitioners (NPs) have provided health-care services to patients for more than 40 years. The nurse practitioner role had its inception in the mid-1960s at the same time that Medicare was introduced, which dramatically increased the need for primary-care providers. In addition to providing many of the same services less expensively such as primary and some acute care, they are qualified to meet the majority of patients’ health-care needs. They promote a comprehensive approach to health care and emphasize the overall health and wellness of their patients.

NPs offer something else that makes them darlings to health reformers: a focus on patient-centered care and preventive medicine. “We seem to be health care’s best-kept secret,” says Jan Towers, health-policy director for the Academy of Nurse Practitioners. Nurse practitioners may have less medical education than full-fledged doctors, but they have far more training in less measurable skills like bedside manner and counseling.

NPs are registered nurses (RNs) who are prepared, through advanced education and clinical training and are granted either a certificate or a master’s degree that is most common today –  this is why they qualify for H-1Bs.

NPs work independently and collaboratively on the health-care team.  Some healthcare analysts and experts see nurse practitioners and Physician Assistants (PAs) as the answer to the growing physician shortage, particularly in primary care.

A TIME Magazine article published this year concerning nurse practitioners indicated that they would perform a key role in healthcare reform:  “Even without reform, experts on the health-care labor force estimate there is currently a 30% shortage in the ranks of primary-care physicians. Fewer than 10% of the 2008 graduating class of medical students opted for a career in primary care, with the rest choosing more lucrative specialties.  That could pose problems if a national health-care bill is enacted.”

After Massachusetts enacted mandates for universal health insurance in 2006, those with new coverage quickly overwhelmed the state’s supply of primary-care doctors, driving up the time patients must wait to get routine appointments. It stands to reason that primary-care doctors could be similarly overwhelmed on a national scale.

Depending on the state in which they practice, nurse practitioners, with advanced training can often treat patients and diagnose ailments as well as prescribe medication. And they can do these things at a lower cost than doctors.  Medicare, for example, reimburses nurse practitioners 85% of what is paid to doctors for the same services.

The new HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius recently said that “to make health reform a reality, we need nurses at the forefront of the effort.” Let us continue to hope that the Obama administration take the abundant opportunities that already exist to make such statements more than just rhetoric.

The Library of Congress’ Thomas database has a hyperlinked version of the new CIR SAP Bill that is better to use if you’re just trying to focus on any one section.  The important sections for Healthcare Immigration are Chapter I, Title III.

Sec. 301 – Recaptures past unused visa numbers
Sec. 302 – Exempts LPR dependents from the IV quotas.
Sec. 303 – Slightly increases the per country quotas.
Sec. 320 – Provides IV cap exemptions for certain STEM and shortage occupations
Sec. 321 – Allows those with pending IVs to file Adjustment of Status even if their priority date is not current.

::::::

For your future reference here is a link to the O*NET for nurse positions that would quality for H-1Bs.  The O*NET is the Occupation Information Network sponsored by the Department of Labor and was released to replace the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

If you missed our first 2 articles in this series, you can view them here:

Advanced Practice Nurses

Clinical Nurse Specialists

Again, remember — for citizens of Canada and Mexico, the TN classification is available under NAFTA as an alternative to the H-1B visa for RNs and other professions listed on the NAFTA List of Occupations.

 

Read more:

Time Magazine:  “If Healthcare Reform Passes, Nurse Practitioners Could be Key”

NurseZone:  Spotlight on Nurse Practitioners

::::::

What can Immigration Solutions do for you?

We can consult with you to determine that the nature of the position and the beneficiary’s background are appropriate for an H-1B or any other nonimmigrant visa classification, and suggest alternatives if the initial proposal is not a viable option. We can advise both the employer and prospective employee regarding documentation requirements and legal issues – and successfully file your case with USCIS.  You can contact our office by email – or phone 562 612.3996.

 

CIR ASAP Summary

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

There’s been alot of chatter today about the introduction of Rep. Gutierrez’ (D-IL) immigration bill that is called Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Safety and Protection (CIR ASAP).

Yesterday, Rep. Gutierrez stated, “We have waited patiently for a workable solution to our immigration crisis to be taken up by this Congress and our President.  The time for waiting is over.”

To address some of the key points:

Backlog Reduction: This would be  a recapture of unused employment-based visas from  previous years (1992 – 2008) with an allowance for future unused visas to roll over the next year; exempting spouses and children from the annual cap; increasing the country quotas; the ability to file for AOS (adjustment of status; i.e. green-cards) before a visa number is available by paying a fee of $500, even thought a visa cannot be issued until a visa number is available.  This does, however, allow for work authorization, travel authorization and maintenance of status.

Employment Verification: Would make E-Verify work verification mandatory for all employers by phasing in current employees and new hires; would impose additional pealties on employers’ failure to follow the E-Verify program.

H-1B and L-1 Nonimmigrant Visas: Would impose requirements on employers to recruit US workers before applying for an H-1B and would increa3se penalties for H-1B violations.  Would create penalties for L-1 violations.

The Undocumented: Would create a 6-year ‘conditional’ non-immigrant status for undocumented (illegal) foreign nationals in the USA.  This would include work authorization and travel authorization; would waive unlawful presence bars and provide a path to permanent residence (green-card) and citizenship.

The Immigration Policy Center has an excellent 6-page more detailed review of the bill which we link to.

AILA applauded the introduction of Rep. Gutierrez’ Bill and stated, “We know how dedicated Rep. gutierrez is to immigration reform,” commented Bernie Wolfsdorf, president of AILA.  “Gutierrez has long been a strong and vocal leader in the CIR movement.  We look forward to analyzing this new CIR bill and hope to work with him and other members of Congress to fix our nation’s dysfunctional immigration system and help spur the country back to economic recovery.”

AILA further stated:  Already, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus and members of the Congressional Black Caucus have endorsed the bill as a solution to both stem illegal immigration and promote legal migration that will protect and strengthen our nation’s economic and national security.

Gutierrez explained at his press conference yesterday that the Senate will still take the lead on debating immigration reform with a bill to be introduced by Sen Charles Schumer (D-NY), Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration.  Janet Napolitano (DHS Secretary) has indicated that they have provided extensive technical assistance to Schumer and his staff as they draft the bill that is predicted to be introduced early 2010.

We will continue to report on any and all news and progress on the immigration reform front.

If you’re interested in more reading….Homeland Security Today NY Times ABC News The Hill

House Immigration Subcommittee Approves Employment Based Recapture and RN/PT Bills

Monday, August 4th, 2008

Both of these bills passed the sub-committee “mark-up” stage in the House Subcommittee last week – a 7:2 vote for H.R. 5924, and 8:1 for H.R. 5882.

This is an important first step forward that will be revisited by Congress following the 5-week “August Recess”. HR 5882 could recapture close to 500,000 green-cards that were lost due to bureaucratic delays for all employment-based categories which would moreover make them current. Family based categories would move forward considerably. HR 5924 would provide 20,000 green-cards per year to RNs and PTs, exempting from the quota dependent family members. We link to the bills below as well as information concerning how a bill becomes a law.

Make sure to sign up for our 8/13/08 teleconference on “Pending Legislation and Retrogression: Strategies and Solutions”. Sign up here!