The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) reported that it had reached a settlement with Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services and its subsidiary, Industrial Services LLC (ISI) on July 21, 2011. The DOJ reports that Industrial Services engaged in a pattern and practice of discrimination while completing Form I-9 on its non-citizen workers requiring specific employment documentation beyond what was required by law.

The investigation was prompted after a work-authorized immigrant lost his job when he could not comply with ISI’s request to provide specific employment documentation beyond what was required by law.   Further investigation revealed that ISI’s Prairieville, LA office required all newly hired non-U.S. citizens to present documents issued by the Department of Homeland Security upon hire.  The company did not require U.S. citizens to present any particular documents.

ISI has agreed to pay $43,560 in civil penalties and $7,200 in back pay, plus interest, to the injured party.   Brand and ISI have also agreed to monitoring provisions, as well as training for their human resources personnel.

What employers need to know: You just cannot presume that the employees charged with  managing your I-9 program are compliant with the law and adhering to anti-discrimination rules and regulations if you’re turning a blind eye to your compliance issues, the consequences of which today  are severe and expensive – not to mention the bad press that accompanies such an investigation. Employers must accept ANY acceptable document from List A that appears to be genuine and that relates to the worker, or a combination List B plus a List C document.  Additionally, employers are not to require more documentation than what is itemized on the List of Documents for Form I-9.

Let’s re-visit ICE’s list of best practices that include the following as a reminder to employers:

• Internal compliance & training program

• Polices/procedures safeguard against discrimination incl. training

• Require I-9 process only by those trained

• Secondary review for each I-9

• Annual I-9 audits by external auditing firm or trained person not involved in I-9 process

• Written I-9 policy

• Protocol to respond to tips/information/constructive knowledge

• Maintain copies of documents

• Participation in E-Verify/SSNVS

We are available  to assist you with your compliance  needs.  Please visit our Employer Resource Center and contact us should you wish to discuss our services and solutions.

The Justice Department announced on November 10th that it has reached a settlement agreement with Hoover Inc., a leading manufacturer of vacuum and carpet cleaners with facilities in Ohio and Texas, to resolve allegations that Hoover engaged in a pattern or practice of employment discrimination by imposing unnecessary and discriminatory hurdles in the I-9 process upon lawful permanent residents.

According to the department’s findings, Hoover required all permanent residents who presented a permanent resident card (green card) for I-9 purposes to produce a new green card when theirs expired. In contrast, Hoover’s U.S. citizen workers were not required to present new documents. Like U.S. citizens, permanent residents are always work authorized, regardless of the expiration of their documentation. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) prohibits employers from treating permanent residents differently than U.S. citizens in the I-9 process.

Under the terms of the settlement, Hoover has agreed to pay $10,200 in civil penalties. Hoover will also train its human resources personnel about employers’ nondiscrimination responsibilities in the I-9 process, and it will provide periodic reports to the department for one year.  Here’s the Press Release

This is one of several recent settlements brought by the DOJ against employers that engage in document abuse.  This occurs when employers treat employees differently based on national origin or citizenship status during the I-9 process.

What does this ruling mean for employers?

Although some I-551 Permanent Resident Cards have an expiration date, employment authorization continues and there is no need to reverify this document upon expiration.  An expiration date on the Form I–551 reflects only that the card must be renewed, not that the bearer’s work authorization has expired,  8 C.F.R.§ 274a.12(a)(1). Further Question 39 on Pg. 36 of the M-274 Handbook states:  You may not re-verify an expired U.S. passport or passport card, an Alien Registration Receipt Card/Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551), or a List B document that has expired.

Here are some examples of prohibited practices that fall under document abuse:

1) Setting different employment eligibility verification standards or requiring different documents based on national origin or citizenship status. One example would be requiring non-U.S. citizens to present DHS-issued documents like “green cards”

2)  Requesting to see employment eligibility verification documents before hire and completion of the Form I-9 because an employee appears foreign or the employee indicates that he or she is not a U.S. citizen.

3)  Refusing to accept a document or hire an individual because an acceptable document has a future expiration date.

4)  Limiting jobs to U.S. citizens unless a job is limited to citizens by law.

5)  Asking to see a document with an employee’s alien or admission number when completing section 1 of Form I-9.

6)  Asking a lawful permanent resident to re-verify employment eligibility because the person’s “green card” has expired.

Should you have any questions, or know that your I-9’s have problems, be smart and proactive and contact an experienced professional in this field who knows the law and can assist you.

We have a terrific I-9 Resource Center for Employers and are available to design a cost-effective audit and training program to suit your particular needs.